Monster of the Month

Join Steve the Author as he delves into the captivating world of lore and monsters from across the globe. Discover the unique history and interesting insights behind his diverse worlds. Whether you're a fan of spine-chilling tales or enchanting adventures, there's something for everyone in Steve's literary portfolio.

Steven DeLong

9/1/202513 min read

The Black Monk of Pontefract: England’s Most Violent Haunting

Introduction

Some hauntings whisper, while others scratch at the edge of our attention. The Black Monk of Pontefract does neither. The activity reported at 30 East Drive in West Yorkshire is the sort that slams doors, drags bodies, and leaves people with bruises they cannot explain. It is a story about an ordinary house that refused to stay ordinary, about a family nudged and then shoved into the impossible. It’s about a robed figure that stepped out of rumor and into the hallway.

This post unfolds in two halves. First: an immersive, third-person narrative that places you inside the Pritchard home as the phenomena escalate. Second: a deep dive into the facts, folklore, and history of the haunting. The theories, timelines, notable investigations, cultural impact, and the unresolved questions that keep this case rattling around the ghost-story canon.

Part One: The Story

A House Like Any Other

By late afternoon the council estate settled into its calm. Buses sighed past, dogs barked and fell quiet, kettles clicked. 30 East Drive wore the same sensible brick and neat hedges as the neighbors, with the same windows mirroring a pale English sky. Inside, Jean and Joe Pritchard moved through the dependable choreography of family life: washing up, homework reminders, a laugh from the living room that made the house seem warmer. Their two kids Diane and Phillip moved along at life's pace with them.

The first oddity was water. Small, saucer-sized puddles appeared on the kitchen floor.One showed up beneath the table, another in front of the sink, a third already spreading towards the hallway like a map of someplace no one wanted to visit. They wiped them up but the puddles returned. A plumber shrugged after finding nothing wrong, and that should have been the end of it. It wasn’t.

Drafts pushed through closed rooms. Cupboards clicked, then banged as though impatient and tired of being ignored. A fine chalky dust sifted from the ceiling, settling on shoulders and hair with stubborn intimacy. When green foam burbled from the tap one night—thick, clingy, a color like rot on a fresh green banana, Phillip held the glass up and swore the bubbles popped as if exhaling. Joe made excuses about dirty pipes but no one believed it.

“Old houses make noises,” Joe assured, the way fathers are expected to assure. Still, he kept glancing over his shoulder, as if someone else in the room had agreed with him.

Giving It a Name

The family invented a nickname for the entity because families do that. They make jokes to insulate from the terror, it creates a waist-high fence and put it around confusion to keep it away from the rest of the things happening in their lives.

“Fred,” Phillip decided, tipping a grin at his sister. “It’s got a ring.”

They said it lightly, and the air eased for a day or two. But after dinner on Friday, the sugar bowl slid down the counter all by itself, quick as a stagehand, then leapt into the air, crashing to the floor. China shattered, sugar scattered across the floor, gritty and white. There was a moment of impossible silence in which everyone had the same thought and no one dared speak it: It wanted us to see.

The jokes cut down to a sliver after that.

What It Wanted

At first, Fred behaved like a mood with hands. Things tilted, toppled, skittered. A framed photo flipped to face the wall. Matches spilled in a little golden fan across the hearth. The front door unlocked itself. The stairs creaked under footsteps that belonged to nobody. The cat stared and hissed at a patch of middle air until its whole small body quivered. They quickly learned to track the storm in the house by watching the cat.

Then the footfalls became a rhythm. The lights dimmed until the room felt like it was twilight all the time. The air thickened—this is how several visitors later described it, that the air itself took on weight and taste—and someone said it smelled like old cellars and wet rope. They were not wrong about the rope.

Fred chose Diane, though no one could say why. She had a teenager’s defiance and sweetness in alternating measure, a quick smile she wore like a secret. When she froze halfway up the stairs one evening, mouth open but wordless, Phillip saw the bruises -purple and black fingerprints - appear around her neck the way breath fogs glass—forming, not already there. He leapt up the last steps two at a time. She was wrenched backward, a rag-doll motion at odds with the real girl’s scream. By the time Jean reached them, Diane was dragged onto the landing as if hauled by a hooked line. The marks remained the rest of the night, proof of something that should never have been possible.

From then on, Diane tried not to walk the upstairs hallway alone. She learned the angles of mirrors, the ways they gathered shadows. She learned to listen for the sound of breathing that wasn’t hers.

Bless This House

They called a vicar. Of course they did. He blessed the rooms with firm certainty, damp fingerprints of holy water shining briefly on plaster. For a few hours the house seemed to hold its breath, relieved or waiting—no one could agree which. That night, a crucifix turned slowly on the wall until the figure hung upside down. A lampshade spun until the cord twisted, clicked, and the bulb popped.

“I think,” the vicar said carefully, “you should keep a diary.” It sounded like a surrender.

They kept the diary. They also kept the bruises, the bites Diane woke with low on her shoulder blade, the slaps no one in the house delivered. They kept the memories of the sounds of footsteps on the landing, each one loud enough that Jean sometimes said a second prayer without meaning to, a little squeak of fear shaped like an Amen.

What People Saw

People came. Family first, then neighbors, then the curious. A local man who didn’t believe in anything but his own good sense watched a drawer slide open in the kitchen and then slam closed on its own. “Draft,” he explained, but he swallowed the second half of the word. A policeman stopped by on personal time. He frowned at the uneven puddles and wiped his hands on his trousers like he’d touched something that felt unclean.

One night, while three visitors sat hip-to-hip on the sofa to prove they weren’t afraid, the curtains billowed though the windows stayed shut, and a cold hand pressed along one of the stranger’s forearm as precisely as if taking his pulse. He stood quickly, said he forgot something at home and left. He did not come back.

Objects of all kinds began to move. A framed print lifted and then threw itself a deliberate ten feet to the left, landing face-down. A heavy wardrobe shuddered and walked. A plastic Santa from a box in the cupboard appeared posed on the stairs in July, its molded smile a rictus in the dark. They began to check wardrobes and cupboards twice, the way you check an oven even if you know you’ve turned it off.

The Monk

Names accumulate like dust. They called it Fred, then not-Fred, then a cluster of things they didn’t repeat to the children. Yet the name that stuck did not come from a joke but from a sighting that kicked the bottom out of the night: a figure in a long black robe, hooded, moving without footfall across the top of the stairs.

Phillip saw him first and swore the robe didn’t swing when it moved, as if the shape inside wasn’t exactly shaped like a man. Others saw a fraction of the same—an edge, a hem swiping a step, the empty dark where a face should be. When the house was quiet, they heard a small sound that might have been rosary beads clicking, or only nerves pretending to be beads because beads would be better than the alternative.

They started calling him the Black Monk because saying “the man” felt too generous.

Escalations

Once, while Jean pinned laundry in a line of sunshine in the small back garden, the pegs snapped one by one like dry bones, shirts flopping to the grass. The kitchen table jerked sideways hard enough to bruise Diane’s hip. A neat stack of plates—which Diane swore had been ordinary seconds before—slid to the edge, hesitated, and stepped off as tidily as if obeying an order.

Then came the rope. It was not rope exactly, but they called it that afterward. One evening Diane was sitting in the living room when a tugging, tightening pressure came around Diane’s throat, pulling up so hard that had her on her tiptoes, and her fingers scraping at nothing. Phillip and Joe tore at the empty air until it let her go. She vomited on the carpet, from fear or lack of air or both; later she cried in heaves so big they looked like coughing.

Diane dreamt of gallows. Woke with the remembered scrape of a rope knot against wood.

Truce, of a Kind

Every haunting has its weather. There were days that belonged to ordinary life: the toast popped, someone borrowed a scarf, the radio hummed a cheerful chorus. Then, almost politely, the weather changed. You could feel the pressure gather. The house made a sound like holding.

Visitors learned that silence could be an omen, that the corridors remembered your footsteps after you had gone. If you held your breath long enough you could hear the breathing below the breathing, a secondary rhythm that did not belong to anyone living.

Sometimes, often enough for the Prichard family to stay sane, the house slept. Days, even weeks would pass with nothing happening. But when the house awoke, it fully came alive.

The Night on the Stairs

They all remember one night the most. (Ask six people who were there, and you will hear six versions that would start differently, but all end the same.)

The upstairs hall bulb blew. They stood in the dim pitched by a bedside lamp, the stairwell a throat of shadow. That’s when he appeared: the Monk, full as winter, not a glimpse but a presence that made the air ring. He slid to the head of the stairs and then filled them, darkness that took the shape of a robe, a hood without a face, the idea of a man standing where a man would stand if a man could be that cold.

For a moment everyone forgot what to do with their bodies. Then Joe swore, a soft worker’s prayer, and advanced, because there are moments when fathers move forward because that is what fathers do. The figure did not retreat. The bulb in the lamp near Diane dropped, blinked against the carpet once, and went out leaving everyone in darkness.

The house did not explode into violence. It did something worse. It waited while they shuffled, touched, counted who was still there. It let them be together in the dark with the knowledge that they were not alone.

The Monk turned—no footfall, no sway of fabric—and left silently, they way night leaves as the sun slowly begins to creep above the horizon in the morning.

What Remains

Over the years the activity waned and surged, like any weather. The Pritchards measured time by it, in months of quiet and weeks of bruises, in corridors walked quickly and doors closed gently as if not to wake a sleeper. The story got out, the way stories do. People came and waited for their own proof, and sometimes they got it—a shove, a whisper, a shape in the corner of a photograph that wasn’t there in the room but insists on being there now.

They moved forward with their lives, because people do that too. But when they drove past East Drive, even years later, everyone in the car looked without admitting they were looking. You cannot unknow a house that learned your name.

30 East Drive still stands. The curtains sometimes twitch because that is what curtains do in British weather. Also, sometimes they twitch because someone inside wants to look and cannot bring himself to step fully into the window. The Monk is not finished, say those who visit; he is only patient. He is the rope learning the shape of a throat. He is the pause between breaths. He is the moment before you turn on the landing and find the step occupied by something that does not move aside.

Part Two: Facts, Folklore, and History

A Brief Timeline and Pattern of Activity

The widely cited start of the haunting at 30 East Drive, Pontefract is the late 1960s, with peak activity clustered around 1966–1968 and intermittent surges thereafter. The family at the center of the case—Jean and Joe Pritchard and their children Phillip and Diane—reported an evolving pattern of phenomena that escalated from oddities to violence:

  • Aqua-anomalies: small puddles of water forming on the kitchen floor without leaks or pipe faults; water appearing to “walk” in uneven patches.

  • Particulate falls: chalk or dust descending from the ceiling, sometimes in visible drifts.

  • Plumbing anomalies: the notorious green foam from taps.

  • Object manipulation: items sliding, levitating, and being thrown; furniture trembling or shifting position.

  • Electrical disturbances: flickering lights, bulbs blowing, rhythmic power dips.

  • Direct assaults: scratches, slaps, bites, choking pressure—with Diane the most frequent target.

  • Apparitional reports: sightings of a tall, black-robed figure—the “Black Monk.”

Unlike many poltergeist accounts that flare briefly, the Pontefract case displayed recurrent waves: active bursts lasting days or weeks, followed by lulls. Witnesses included family members, neighbors, clergy, and various investigators.

Why “Monk”? The Folkloric Backdrop

The “monk” identity draws on local lore tying the area around East Drive to earlier ecclesiastical sites and, crucially, to historic execution grounds (often summarized as “gallows hill”). One folkloric thread suggests the executed figure was a religious man condemned for a crime against a girl, an origin sometimes invoked to explain the haunting’s fixation on Diane. The robe and hood described by witnesses anchor the label, although the entity’s behavior aligns more with poltergeist phenomena than with traditional place-bound residual hauntings.

It’s worth noting that monastic imagery in British ghostlore is common—hooded monks, grey ladies, black friars—often serving as a shorthand for history condensed into a human silhouette. Even if documentary proof of the exact monk is contested, the archetype resonates because it binds religion, guilt, and punishment into one stark figure.

The House as a Site: Geography of a Haunting

Hauntings often collect where history, architecture, and psychology intersect. Consider:

  • Layered land-use: Council estates frequently overlay older, less documented histories—farm fields, lanes, gallows sites, forgotten boundaries—all of which invite retrospective storytelling.

  • Threshold architecture: Stairs, landings, and doorways featured repeatedly in testimonies. Liminal spaces—places of passing rather than staying—are common stages for reported apparitions.

  • The adolescent catalyst: Paranormal literature notes a link between RSPK (recurrent spontaneous psychokinesis) and adolescents, especially during emotionally turbulent years. Whether you interpret this as latent psi or unconscious mischief, the pattern appears across famous cases (Pontefract is often discussed in the same breath as Enfield for this reason).

Investigations, Media, and Documentation

Across decades, amateur and professional investigators, authors, and television crews have visited 30 East Drive, collecting a loose braid of anecdotes, photographs, audio clips, and field notes. The site has been profiled in books on poltergeists and documentaries, and dramatized in the film When the Lights Went Out. Paranormal series that trade in night-vision dread have used the house as a proving ground; enthusiasts book overnight stays to test their nerve.

The case’s durability owes less to a single “smoking gun” piece of evidence than to the accumulation of consistent—if subjective—reports from unconnected witnesses across many years. In folklore terms, that is exactly how robust legends form: not from one perfect photograph, but from layered testimony that refuses to vanish.

Skeptical Frames and Naturalistic Explanations

A fair accounting acknowledges skeptical positions:

  1. Psychology & Social Dynamics. Poltergeist clusters often map onto familial stress and adolescent volatility. The hypothesis: micro-hoaxes (conscious or not) cascade into group reinforcement. Once a household “buys in,” ambiguous events are read as confirmation.

  2. Building & Environment. Old houses can creak, drafts can slam doors, wiring can misbehave. Capillary action and condensation can mimic mystery puddles; plumbing additives or corrosion could, in rare cases, discolor water.

  3. Witness Reliability. Memory is suggestible; fear sharpens impressions but blurs details. Subsequent retellings may “settle” into a more coherent story than any single night truly was.

These frameworks explain a great deal, and anyone who cares about truth should keep them close. But critics struggle with three stubborn facts of Pontefract:

  • Multiplicity of witnesses over a long interval.

  • Direct physical contact (bruises, bites, choking) described independently.

  • Apparitional consistency—the hooded figure seen by different people in different contexts.

The skeptical case is powerful; the residual mystery remains.

Why I Chose This Case

The Black Monk stubbornly holds its spot in the haunted-house pantheon for several reasons:

  • Violence beyond the norm. Many hauntings frighten; fewer leave finger-marks where fingers are not placed.

  • Domestic dissonance. The setting is painfully ordinary. No castle keep, no crypt chapel. Just a landing with cheap carpet and a family photo on the wall. Terror in a place that should protect you is terror that sticks.

  • A face you cannot see. The hooded figure is storytelling economy—instantly legible and difficult to debunk because it resists features. No face to scrutinize, only a shape you recognize in the ether.

Ethical Questions and Dark Tourism

30 East Drive has become a destination. That status raises questions: Who benefits? Who is protected? The house is not a museum; it is a former family home with neighbors who must live beside its legend. Visitors should seek permission, follow house rules, and avoid pushing fragile narratives into exploitation. Curiosity and respect can coexist.

Practical Notes for the Curious (Without Sensationalism)

  • If you go, document responsibly. Keep a log: temperature, time, EMF readings if you use them, moods, and baseline noise.

  • Co-witnessing matters. Record what each person perceived before comparing notes to reduce suggestion effects.

  • Expect the ordinary. Most nights will offer nothing more than creaks, drafts, and your own heartbeat. If something happens, treat it like fieldwork, not a carnival ride.

Why the Legend Still Bites

Strip the case to its essentials and you’re left with a story that speaks to an ancient fear: not simply that we die, but that what’s done here may linger; that violence imprints; that guilt can be heavy enough to anchor an entity here. The Black Monk is a shape for dread. We give dread a robe and a hood so we can point at it and say, their shape resembles us, but what’s beneath doesn’t.

Why This Haunting Speaks to The Fracture

The story of the Black Monk endures because it refuses to stay on the page. It presses—on memory, on place, on the delicate membrane between what we call ordinary and what we privately fear is not. It asks what happens when history refuses to rest, when a place remembers not with plaques and dates but with cold spots and hands.

When I wrote The Fracture, I kept circling the same unease. In the novel, a séance inside a closed mental institution invites something through—a presence that attaches and won’t let go. Though the details differ, the emotional logic parallels Pontefract: ordinary people confronting an extraordinary intrusion, discovering how quickly a safe place—home, school, a hospital ward—can become a threshold.

Both tales pivot on a terrible possibility: once an opening exists—whether a ritual invitation in fiction or a historical wound in fact—something may answer. And once it answers, it may claim a stake in your life. The Pritchards coped with the rope-tight pressure on a landing; my characters grapple with a ghost that won’t go away, voices that thread into their thoughts long after the séance ends. Different corridors, same map of dread.

That is why the Black Monk still matters to me—and, I suspect, to readers of The Fracture. He is not merely a local legend. He is a shape for the question we keep trying not to ask: What if the past is not past? What if it waits right where we live, where we sleep, one step above us on the stairs?

If you’ve read The Fracture, you already know how thin the distance can be between a room and what shares it with you. And if you carry this post with you tonight, if you catch yourself pausing on the landing and listening, you will have understood the Black Monk in the way the story intends—not as a relic, but as a presence that teaches you to pay attention to what the house remembers.